D24T.com  

Go Back   D24T.com > Technical Discussion Area > Diesel Engine and Drivetrain
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-01-2013, 08:19 AM
ngoma ngoma is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by v8volvo View Post
A simple check of timing doesn't involve moving the IP case to align the marks on the bracket, etc -- all you do is put the dial indicator in, put cold start lever in warm position, and turn the engine over by hand read the current timing position.

Timing is tricky on these motors until you get the hang of it so let's start again from the beginning. Without altering any engine settings, the dial indicator holder is installed in the pump, the rod is attached to the dial, the dial and rod are inserted into the holder, and pushed in far enough to have *at least* 2mm of preload reading on the dial. I see that your dial reads from 0-8mm, so you have more than enough range; the full stroke of the IP plunger is on the order of ~2mm so with your gauge I would set maybe 4mm of preload just to make things easy. You make sure the cold start advance lever is in the disengaged (warm) position. At this point you are equipped to measure the stroke of the hi-pressure piston in the pump, which is how you'll determine static pump timing.

Now you start to turn the engine over by hand, rotating *clockwise* if viewing the crankshaft from the front (your ratchet is set in the "tighten" direction with a 27mm socket on the front of the crank). This means the IP is rotating *counterclockwise* if your perspective is the drive sprocket end of the IP (i.e. the rear of the engine), but *clockwise* if you are looking at it from the end into which the dial indicator is inserted. OK, so you're spinning the engine over, in the direction of engine rotation, but for now you are ignoring all the TDC marks, you're just spinning the crank and watching the dial indicator. The needle is rising and falling by somewhere around 2mm, six times for every two complete rotations of the crankshaft. You'll notice a high point the needle climbs to each, and also a low point where it returns and rests for several degrees of crank rotation before climbing again. This is the "zero" point for your dial indicator -- you'll rotate the face of the dial so that the needle is reading zero each time it returns to that lowest point, and climbing by roughly 2mm from that low point on each pump stroke.

Now is the time when, if there is some kind of problem with the preload you have chosen or the operation of your tool, you'll find out about it. If you're seeing a much lower number for piston displacement than ~2mm, or your zero point is erratic, then you know you have an issue that needs to be corrected before you can get a real final reading. But assuming everything up to this point is working as described, continue:

OK, you have been turning the engine over and got the dial indicator dialed in and everything is rising and falling satisfactorily to a reliable zero point -- now is the time when you'll finally start paying attention to the TDC marks. Look on the outer edge of the IP sprocket and you'll see it has a notch in it in one location. When that notch lines up with the corresponding notch in the upper outer ear of the IP's mounting flange (pictured in the photo you attached earlier), that indicates the pump is on #1 injection stroke. Note that the mark you care about is the one on the IP flange ear, *not* the one on the IP mounting bracket -- if these are lined up then they're one and the same, but if they are not aligned (as they are not in your picture), that's no big deal as far as timing is concerned, but keep in mind that the one on the *pump* is the one that matters and you will be paying attention to.

Rotate the engine, *only* in the direction of rotation (i.e. clockwise at the front of the crank), until that notch on the IP sprocket has traveled around and is beginning to approach the notch on the IP flange ear. Watch the dial indicator, which has been rising and falling. As the IP sprocket slowly comes around and gets closer to the notch, you'll see the needle fall one last time to your zero mark, and then start to rise again. Now, turn the crank as slowly as possible and watch the flywheel thru the window in the bellhousing. Keep turning slowly until you see the "0" mark on the flywheel align with the pointer in the bellhousing. Take the wrench carefully off the front of the crank. Check that the notch on the outer edge of the IP sprocket is roughly lined up with the notch on the outer ear of the pump mounting flange. If so, you're done. Now look at the dial indicator. The reading you see showing there is your timing value.

If your engine was starting and running to any degree at all, this reading will likely be at least about .70 and at most about 1.00 (aka zero). If it's way outside that range, you need to know if it's too low, or too high, since if the reading is above 0.99mm you will not know from the dial's final position if it's already gone around once or not. As you are doing the final stage of the above process, working the crank up to #1 TDC, keep an eye on the dial indicator and see what it's doing. If it wraps all the way around past 1mm before you reach TDC, you know your reading is high; if it rises only straight from the resting zero point and doesn't complete a full rotation by the time you have reached TDC you know the reading is low.

Long-form version, sorry, hope that helps and makes enough sense without pictures... One last thing, if you overshoot the marks while trying to come up to TDC, you can have success backing way far off in the reverse direction of rotation and coming up at it again, but often easier to just go all the way around again in the clockwise direction to ensure no possibility of error.

Let us know what you find. I will be traveling to Denver in about 3 weeks so if all else fails we can link up and give it a try then...
Mod, an we make this a sticky, "Checking IP timing?"
__________________
1985 744 gle d24t
1985 745 gle d24t
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-05-2013, 09:15 AM
Hecklebone Hecklebone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 79
Default

Nope, i do not have an intercooler. Turbo goes straight into the intake manifold.
I think i can lean it out a bit more and ill watch the temp go up.
My boost gauge indicates 11psi max boost, which suprised me for such a small turbo.
I am also trying to figure out how i can add a bit more fuel at the top end. I have a bit of smoke now, but once the engine is WOT in top gear there is no smoke. I have a HP22 four speed auto transmission and it max's out at 60mph on flat land.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-07-2013, 07:06 PM
745 TurboGreasel 745 TurboGreasel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Freedom CA
Vehicle: 85 745, 84Suburban 96Ram
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecklebone View Post
Nope, i do not have an intercooler. Turbo goes straight into the intake manifold.
I think i can lean it out a bit more and ill watch the temp go up.
My boost gauge indicates 11psi max boost, which suprised me for such a small turbo.
I am also trying to figure out how i can add a bit more fuel at the top end. I have a bit of smoke now, but once the engine is WOT in top gear there is no smoke. I have a HP22 four speed auto transmission and it max's out at 60mph on flat land.
In that case, I'd say your low EGT says you are underfuled when on boost.
11PSI is factory. (or your gauge isn't that good?)

A ball and spring boost controller will spool you up 500 RPM sooner, and I think a 2 stage that is bypassed when not floored would be better for EGT and economy. It helped a lot on my car, but maybe not as much with the auto. I'd turn up the max fuel screw till you can hit at least 1200 on a long grade, and your top speed may go up quite a bit. What is your RPM at that speed?
If you back the set screw on top of the boost compensator(which limits off boost fueling) out some, you will get more throw out of the mechanism (and possibly have to bump your low idle screw up)(I have seen one stick, and not deliver boost enrichment after the pump sat a long time).

Behind the plug under the boost reference line is the star wheel which preloads the spring manifold pressure has to overcome. Spin it in a few clicks makes it easier to fuel up as the boost comes on.

Tight spring = puff of black when you floor it, fading as boost catches up
Loose spring = black smoke on boost.
Not enough max fuel = no smoke ever(well, at least turn it up till you have some smoke, then back it off just enough for your taste/EGT).
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-10-2013, 09:37 AM
Hecklebone Hecklebone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 79
Default

I adjusted the main fuel screw with the anaroid/LDA disconnected until there was just a wisp of smoke. Turning this down a bit raised my EGT to 1100f. Then i connected the LDA. I backed the top screw out(so far i lost it, anyone know the thread size?) so there is not off boost extra fuel. I rotated the plunger/rod for minimum fuel. Then i adjusted the spring underneath so the additional fuel kick in at the right time. This resulted in the star wheel being up most of the way...i compress the spring when i put the top on the LDA. Then i rotated the diaphram for a little more fuel when on bost.
This is the best i have ever had it running. I can accelerate up hills now, but not like my STI of course.
I have new VDO boost and EGT gauges. The peek boost now is right around 10psi, which suprises me for such a tiny turbo.
Where i am at now, this seems to be the most power i can extract with little smoke. Remember, i am in Denver and go up from here. Also the Pinz is about 7000 pounds.
This all sound abut right? If so, i suspect my two options for more power are a bigger turbo(i have the fuel capacity) and/or a custom grind cam shaft.

Thanks for all the info so far gents, i wouldnt be this far along without your assistance!

We need a dancing bannana emoticon..the Ford Raptor forum has them and my buddies are giving me grief. (Dancing bananna goes here)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-10-2013, 02:01 PM
745 TurboGreasel 745 TurboGreasel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Freedom CA
Vehicle: 85 745, 84Suburban 96Ram
Posts: 509
Default

You can run more boost, but will probably want an intercooler or meth injection pretty soon.Some folks run 20 PSI on the stock turbo, I found my car felt noticeably perkier even at 15. Over 12 or so, you have to block or wedge shut the emegency overboost protector BOV looking thing on the manifold if your rig is so equipped. VW had them on early TD's but didn't bother on later ones as it isn't useful.
I seemed to do well with a soft setting on the spring, but I have lots of air at sea level.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-18-2013, 12:48 PM
v8volvo v8volvo is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montana, USA
Vehicle: '86 745, '83 764
Posts: 1,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecklebone View Post
This is the best i have ever had it running. I can accelerate up hills now, but not like my STI of course.
I have new VDO boost and EGT gauges. The peek boost now is right around 10psi, which suprises me for such a tiny turbo.
Where i am at now, this seems to be the most power i can extract with little smoke. Remember, i am in Denver and go up from here. Also the Pinz is about 7000 pounds.
This all sound abut right? If so, i suspect my two options for more power are a bigger turbo(i have the fuel capacity) and/or a custom grind cam shaft.

Thanks for all the info so far gents, i wouldnt be this far along without your assistance!

We need a dancing bannana emoticon..the Ford Raptor forum has them and my buddies are giving me grief. (Dancing bananna goes here)
Sounds like you have got it dialed in pretty good now.

Stock boost w/o intercooler is right about 10, actually a tick less on most of them I have measured, so you're right on there. The intercooled motors run more, 12.5 pounds stock I think on the exact same turbo just with the compressor housing clocked the other way -- but the only way they can get away with that and get as much of a power bump as they do from it is because of the intercooler. One thing, though, is that when tuning for high altitude, from the perspective of the motor's survival (i.e. absolute manifold pressure) you can really raise the boost considerably, since w/o electronic engine management your wastegate is only working against relative pressure vs the atmosphere so the actual amount of oxygen entering the motor for a given static boost setting is less at higher altitude than it is at sea level or 5280'. In other words, you need a higher pressure differential vs atmospheric at altitude to cram the same amt of O2 into the motor that you do at the stock boost setting at sea level, thus correspondingly running an appropriately elevated boost setting at higher altitude could give you enough air to make the motor perform like it should with a stock boost level at low altitude, except...

The catch to keep in mind with this is that while you can turn up the boost to achieve that oxygen mass compensation at altitude, it will come with a lot more heat than the same absolute pressure (i.e. O2 quantity) would at sea level with a lower pressure differential, due to having to spin the turbo much faster to achieve it -- so an intercooler becomes necessary in order to reap much benefit from it, or water/methanol injection, as 745TG suggested. With a stock turbo at high altitude, making one of these really fly is very tough due to the issue of charge air heat generation, and with a larger turbo at altitude boost lag could become unbearable - an unfortunate catch-22 that probably only a well-managed VNT arrangement could fully resolve... However, with a stock turbo adding an intercooler, combined with slightly elevated boost levels, should make it able to perform roughly as well as it does, stock, at sea level most of the time. My theoretical assessment anyway -- hoping to have a chance to put the theory to the test with mine at some point here, it does fine driving around in Denver traffic, but I am still having trouble getting used to the difference in power with it when climbing hills...

Were you maxing out at 60 on the flat in top gear in the trans, or in 3rd? I've had both my MT and AT TD Volvos up here at Denver altitude and above on multiple occasions and generally find the automatic to be an advantage in getting the vehicle rolling since the converter helps build boost faster, but the one disadvantage is that when climbing hills or fighting a headwind, the ZF's torque converter lockup in top gear oftentimes comes right at the point in the rev band where it drops the engine speed down to where it can't quite pull anymore and hobbles the thing. Your rig is probably geared much lower overall than a Volvo car but depending on where your shift and lockup points are, there could still be more to be gained by playing with the trans kickdown cable some...

We'll work on getting the banana loaded in.

Last edited by v8volvo; 02-18-2013 at 12:56 PM. Reason: redundant info
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-03-2013, 12:47 PM
v8volvo v8volvo is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montana, USA
Vehicle: '86 745, '83 764
Posts: 1,622
Default

Got to work on one of these yesterday and found it an interesting struggle. The one I was dealing with had a manual trans in it, and I was not able to find any viewing window into the bellhousing to look at a TDC mark on the flywheel. It had had an IP put on it some time ago and the guy who did it got the timing off enough that it would not run. I spent a while searching for a timing mark, even pulled the slave cyl inspection cover off and it was looking like I might have to drag the starter out, there's no opening in the BH anywhere. Finally ended up deciding to just time it off the cam going by seat of the pants and got it running OK, but still hoping to have a chance to get a numerical value on it. Unfortunately info seems to be in very short supply for these motors in Pinzgauers, Hecklebone if you have a source for repair manuals for these, I could use the info...

In any case it seems like you're fortunate to have an automatic in yours -- looking at your pictures it looks like your setup is much easier to work on.

BTW, quite a rig overall, looking at the underside of it, it is pretty clear that they don't share any genes with normal passenger vehicles....



Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-16-2013, 12:37 PM
Hecklebone Hecklebone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 79
Default

Today i was able to remove a seat, the cowling and the rocker cover. Look what i found inside.



Break number one:


Break number two!


Curious what the valves and pistons look like when i get the head off.

Last edited by Hecklebone; 03-16-2013 at 12:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-16-2013, 01:14 PM
Hecklebone Hecklebone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 79
Default

Make that three breaks, four pieces...
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-16-2013, 04:32 PM
745 TurboGreasel 745 TurboGreasel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Freedom CA
Vehicle: 85 745, 84Suburban 96Ram
Posts: 509
Default

Wow, never seen one that didn't stick at least one piece through the valve cover. Were the cam caps still tight? maybe the head is OK. crushing the lifter cups give the valves some leeway at low speed, though they risk dropping a head into the piston later IMO.

Check the crank nose real close too.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.